Pop Culture Paper

TV Bad! TV Good? Orwell, Huxley, Postman Oh My!!! Squirrel....! What? Oh, sorry, I got distracted. Jersey Thursday, ya know.

Anyway.

Write to prompt 3 on page 787 of your book. Keep it to 1000 words +/- 10%.

Remember that a synthesis paper is essentially a research paper in that you are using sources. Those sources need to be cited. So, remember to look over the research paper resources for how to do that. Also, Easybib.com is your friend and he loves to help out with works cited pages.

It is due on Monday April 16th. That will give those music and FBLA people time to upload whatever they swyped on their phones to Google Docs and give it a quick revision before submitting it. ;)

Women's Brains

brains...braaaaaiiins

As we wrestle with the unpleasant, but important to understand Women's Brains by Stephen Jay Gould, work on the Rhetoric and Style questions 1-12 on pages 354-55 of the TLC book. They are due Friday.

As you work with this essay, think about the implications of the ideas in the essay -- both those of Gould and of those he quoted. Are there echoes of those ideas alive and kicking today? How? When? Where? To what extent? ;) Thinking about these issues will prime you for the next synthesis paper. (Yeah, I know we are just starting the Pop Culture synthesis paper, but we gotta keep moving. As a hyper but charming lemur once said, we've got "to move it, move it!")

TV B-Gone!

By Wednesday, blog the answers to the remaining essays in the TV conversation section (essays 2, 3, and 5). Remember that the grammar from chapter 7 is due on Monday and we'll begin working with our paper on Monday as well. Have a good weekend!

Want to win a Nook? A trip to DC? A $10,000 scholarship? Check this out...

Want a TV B-Gone of your own? Well, you're in luck! Just stay out of the sports bars...

TV Turnoff Week Poster

Take another look at the TV Turnoff Week poster by Anthony DeVivo. Blog the questions that follow, paying special attention to the tone and the effectiveness of the airline card model.
Also, read this short article and we'll use it to discuss other essays in our book.

So, now TV is good for you?

Tonight, finish the article we started in class (p. 766) and blog the questions immediately following it. Also, think a bit about your favorite TV show. Based on his article, how would you describe it? How many threads? Complex structure? Content? Etc.

What's there to say about Pronouns?

This one shouldn't give you too many headaches. Complete the Chapter 7 grammar section beginning on page 420 for Monday.

Emily, Elvis, and Featherless Suede

Hans Ostrom

This weekend, read and interact with Emily Dickinson and Elvis Presley in Heaven by Hans Ostrom. You may need to look up some of the references and allusions since both of these pop culture figures come from times before your own.

Then blog questions 1-5. These questions are all meant to help you make sense of this poem and its commentary on pop culture.

Lastly, brainstorm some famous people you'd like to toss together in heaven that would help illustrate your own commentary on pop culture.

a.k.a. my college adviser

After this and the activities on Monday, we'll start to narrow to the topic of our first synthesis paper.

This disaster is brought to you by Hollywood!

The product of some excellent group work in 4th period...

Do: Read the essay on page 751 of our book. And blog the questions at the end of the essay.

Extra Information: We may have some time to work on some questions tomorrow in class, at least that was the plan.

Some have asked that we explicate that rather dense multiple choice passage from today, which strikes we as a very valuable exercise. That said, the discussion on this Hollywood essay may be homework, but we'll see. If you find yourself in need of a pencil or pen tomorrow when we mark up that passage, talk to Arika. She's got you covered. ;)

The dialectical relationship of the self to society

Based on our discussions of the dialectic to the right, blog your thoughts on this “feedback loop” between the self and society. Use Frontline’s video essay Merchants of Cool as a basis for your arguments. You may wish to consider the following questions in your write-up.

• What do you think of the premise put forth by Frontline and by the dialectic model above? 
• Do you see an authentic way to take control of your relationship between the, or rather your, self and society? 

This post is due Monday.

If you were gone on the music trip or off cavorting around Disney World, you can watch all or part of the video at the PBS website.

Merchants of Cool

For those of you who were absent today (Thursday), you can get the link to the documentary The Merchants of Cool at the PBS website or by Googling "Merchants of Cool". We'll finish and debrief it in class tomorrow.

Remember it came out in 2001 so some of it will be outdated, but the mechanisms behind the trends are still very much in use. We'll talk about the relationship between the individual and society explored in this documentary on Friday.

Corn Pone Opinions

From page 721, blog Questions on Rhetoric and Style numbers 2 and 6-11. This will be due on Friday.

6th period, I did a poor job answering Dimarya's question about the difference between a phrase and a clause. This site does it well; this one goes into greater detail.
The heart of what I said in class is still the most important takeaway though. Being able to explain that an author is using parallelism and to what purpose is the main event.

The Collected Notes on the Synthesis Prompt from the 2011-2012 Class

Past classes
2011
2010
2008
Notes from the book

4th Period
Sahej, Lauren, Libby, Karan
Requirements:

• Take a position on whether you think television has had a positive effect on elections.
• Defend, challenge or qualify your position using at least three sources.
• Demonstrate good control of citations and provide commentary.
• Combine sources with opinion to form a cohesive argument. In other words: Synthesize!

Pitfalls to Avoid:

• Failure to cite three sources/ present an argument.
• Misunderstanding, misreading, or summarizing the cited sources.
• Oversimplifying one’s argument.
• Inconsistent writing and/or bad grammar.

Characteristics of Good Essays:

• Have a developed thesis.
• Sophistication in writing and grammar.
• Include 3 cited sources that support student’s position
• Information garnered from sources is related to thesis, and student’s opinion is included.
• Convincing/ developed argument.

Characteristics of Middle Scoring Essays:

• Have a thesis, but it is straightforward.
• Have three cited sources but link between position and sources is strained.
• Commentary for source material is brief/ ineffective.
• Lapses in diction/syntax
• Less developed argument.

Characteristics of Low Scoring Essays:

• No recognizable thesis.
• Sources are not cited, but alluded to.
• Less development of position.
• Lapses in diction/syntax.
• Evident that student is overwhelmed with sources.
• Evident that student misunderstood source material.
• Overall lack of organization.
• Repetitive Conclusion .
• Last but not the least, Failure to present an argument..

Strategies for success on the synthesis essay:

• Meet the basic requirements.
• Add insight and commentary to the sources, do not merely cite them.
• Demonstrate control of language.
• Put forth a convincing argument.
• Read the question carefully.

Alexis, Aylin, Chantelle, Maria
1.Cite at least 3 sources; defend, qualify, or challenge the claim; use direct and indirect citation.2. Avoid summary and paraphrasing, citing less than 3 sources, alluding to the sources, misunderstanding or misrepresenting the sources and/or prompt.
3. Makes point clear and interesting at the beginning and carries it through the essay. Connects/relates points/claims to sources. Conclusion answers "so what?" issue not merely summarizes. Meets requirements. Uses outside sources.
4. Middle-scoring essays do not go in depth. Weak or literal connection to the sources. Does not approach the complexity of the issue just addresses the top layer. Repetitive. Meets most of the requirements.
5. Overwhelming with sources. They tend not to give their personal opinion. Lack of citations. Topic is not well addresses and there is little analysis.
6. Address the prompt and stay on task. Avoid tangents. Relate sources to the prompt and the wanted points. Meet all the requirements 



Synthesis Essay Questions
Group Members: Samuel Ju, Brittany Keating, Jonathan Ngo, Timothy Wong

1. The requirements for this synthesis essay is to use a minimum of 3 sources, and follow the prompt. This prompt was to defend, challenge, or qualify the claims that television has had a positive impact on presidential elections.

2. Some pitfalls to avoid would be to not solely rely on the sources and its quotes, but to use them wisely and effectively. Another pitfall to avoid would be to have decent information and not make stuff or statistics up.

3. Characteristics of a good essay is an essay that effectively uses the sources, transitions them into their paper smoothly. Incorporate good analysis and effectively support the argument.

4. Characteristics of a mid-level essay is an adequate use of the sources, and adequate support for their argument. They essays may be flawed and require a more in-depths analysis of their argument. Lacks sophistication, only meets the requirements of the essay.

5. Characteristics of a low essay is one that inadequately uses the sources effectively, argument does not make sense, does not propose a solid position on the argument.

6. Strategies for success on a synthesis essay would be to know the position, develop your position, then read the sources looking for quotes you can use on your essay to support, qualify your argument.

Tommy < Friends

Lara, Jessie, Arika, Tommy, Jada, Brock

 Requirements:

• 3 cited sources
• Follow the prompt and answer the question directly

Pitfalls:

• Summarizing the information given
• Giving too much information
• Citing the wrong info/data

Characteristics of Good Essays:

• Incorporated good amount of cited information
• Clear thesis statement that answered the prompt

Characteristics of Mid-Level Essays:

• Good amount of information used but may not be clearly cited
• Thesis well written but not in depth

Characteristics of Low-Scoring Essays:

• Not enough sources
• Cited information inadequately
• No solid argument or statement of thesis

Strategies for Success:

• Use information wisely. DON'T LET INFORMATION USE YOU.
• Do not summarize.
• Make clear thesis statement that ANSWERS the prompt given.

6th Period

Julian, Andrew, Tyler

1. Use your personal knowledge, along with knowledge provided in the sources, to create an informed argument  for an issue.

2. Alluding to knowledge gained from reading the sources rather than actually citing the sources.

3. High-level essays generally being by explaining the topic at hand, then establishing a strong thesis. The body of the essay not only cites sources in their evidence; they also explain how they relate to the thesis. They end by answering the all important "so what" question. Why should people care?

4. Mid-level essays carry similar traits to that of a high-level essay but lack sophistication or complexity. They are very straightforward and literal in the way the uses sources and in the way they relate them back to their thesis.

5. Low-level essays often seemed overwhelmed by the sources. They have a weak thesis, don't cite sources, and/or don't explain how the sources relate back to the thesis.

6. Strategies for success should be to establish a strong thesis, make sure to always cite sources and relate them back to the thesis, and to use BOTH outside and provided evidence for your essay.

Team Dwight

Megan, Carol-ann, Sierra, and Dimarya

What are the requirements?
-Essays need to synthesize at least 3 sources for support
-Take a position that defends, challenges, or qualifies the claim. In this case, the claim would need to stem from the idea that television has had a positive impact on presidential elections

What pitfalls should one avoid?
-The essay being overwhelmed by sources
-Summarizing or describing the source material rather than contextualizing the issue at hand
-Not citing sources

Characteristics of good essays...
-Contextualizes the issue at hand for the readers
-Smartly choosing samples to enhance one's argument
-Not only summazing but addressing the "so what"

Characteristics of mid-level essays...
-Brief contextualizing that helps readers understand why they should engage with the issue at hand
-Straightforward thesis but does not do much to accommodate the complexity of the issue
-Conclusion tends to be repetitive, often returning to language that is similar to the thesis

Characteristics of low essays...
-The essay is overwhelmed with sources
-The sources given dominate the conservation instead of the writer putting his/her argument into the essay
-The thesis is weak and unrecognizable
-Sources aren't cited
-Writer misunderstands the source given

Strategies for successful synthesis essays
-Adding one's on opinion to the argument
-Utilizing outside information to strengthen argument
-Not just rephrasing given arguement, but making one's own 

Ross, Nate, Dalton, Saisha

Requirements:

• Integrate at least 3 sources.
• Develop and support a position 
• Make your argument central.
• Don't go off on a tangent.

High Scoring Essay Qualities:

• Extended consideration of sources. Explain their significance.
• Connect author and self
• Effectively pick out important information from the sources.
• Address the "so what?"

Mid Level Essay Qualities:

• Straightforward thesis.
• Literal connections - not in depth.
• Conclusion repeats thesis.

Low Scoring Essay Qualities:

• Sources overwhelm the writer
• Summarizing
• Describing
• Paraphrasing
• Not citing sources
• No commentary

AVOID:

• Being overwhelmed by sources.
• Summarizing
• NOT citing your sources
• Developing a weak thesis
• Large quotes with no commentary
• Oversimplification of the topic at hand
• Reporting on sources (not analyzing/connecting)
• PLAGIARISM 

Andrei and Bayley

Requirements -
Read the prompt and documents, combining the document information and prior knowledge to answer the prompt.
Use at least three documents in your response.

Pitfalls to Avoid >:( -
Overuse of sources.
Use of no sources.
No explanation of sources (no commentary).
Choppy/uneven diction and syntax (switching from formal to informal diction, for example).
Misreading the prompt.
Misreading the documents.
Not answering the prompt.
Not citing the sources.

Characteristics of High-Scoring Essays -
Complex thesis.
Use of more than three sources.
Detailed explanation of source information and how it relates to the prompt.
Combination of information from the sources and prior knowledge.
Always cite your sources.

Characteristics of Middle-Scoring Essays -
Good thesis, if underdeveloped.
Use of three sources.
Lacking good connection between source information and prior knowledge.
Lacking use of prior knowledge.

Characteristics of Low-Scoring Essays -
No thesis.
No sources.
No prior knowledge use.
No citing sources.
Improper grammar/syntax/diction.
Overuse of sources.
Misunderstanding of sources.
Misunderstanding of prompt.
Repetitive syntax/diction.

Strategies for Success :) -
Read the prompt several times.
Read the documents several times if possible in order to understand them.
Cite your sources.
Avoid tangents.
Avoid repetition of syntax and diction.

The path of the lahar!

If you are interested in why we have those crazy lahar drills, here are some links to keep you up at night.
General Info
Good gov site
According to PBS, Mt. Rainier is America's most dangerous volcano...
Paths of Destruction: The Hidden Threat at Mount Rainier

Official release about today's test:

On Monday March, 5th at noon, Pierce County Emergency Management will test the 17 outdoor lahar warning sirens in the Puyallup River Valley. This is a monthly drill that takes place on the first Monday of the month. A Pierce County Alert will be launched at 9:00 on Monday morning to citizens who have signed up to receive informational messages.

Rules of the Herd

Carefully read the short passage below.

The black philosopher’s idea was that a man is not independent, and cannot afford views which might interfere with his bread and butter. If he would prosper, he must train with the majority; in matters of large moment, like politics and religion, he must think and feel with the bulk of his neighbors, or suffer damage in his social standing and in his business prosperities. – Mark Twain from Corn-Pone Opinions

For the quote above, you must provide a clear explanation of the writer's assertion, then defend, challenge, or qualify it, noting the complexity of the issue and acknowledging any possible objections to your point of view.

Limit: 300-400 words posted to the blog

For the curious and/or culinary: Corn-pone